Wednesday morning, four legislators and two members of the Douglas administration sat around a conference table while a financial analyst from the Legislature's Joint Fiscal Office went over a list of 90 items that could help the state dig out of a financial hole.
The list included $7.5 million in new revenues, most transferred from special purpose funds plus $1.8 million raised from fees that would be increased a year early. (The original list had $7.8 million in revenues, but one item was off the list by afternoon.)
The proposed cuts -- $38.4 million -- drew more frowns. Cut another 200 jobs, bringing the total by July 1, 2009 to 600. Close the St. Albans prison and send all the inmates out of state where their stays are cheaper.
Sen. Susan Bartlett, D-Lamoille, said the administration and legislative leaders wanted a lot of choices. "We really felt it was important for everything to be on the table."
Or most everything. Rep. Steve Howard, D-Rutland asked later in the day at the House Democratic caucus if anything had been taken off the list before it was made public.
Yes, replied Rep. Martha Heath, D-Westford. She offered an example. Not giving a cost of living increase to an aged and blind program was scratched.
The four heads of the Legislature's money committees will join the finance commissioner and secretary of administration again today to see if they can reach consensus on what part of the list to use to fill the $24.5 million hole in General Fund revnues.
It will be a strange give and take -- an experiment in bipartisan cooperation conducted in public rather than behind closed doors, which is where most deals are hatched.
If they agree -- by Friday, then the Senate Appropriations Committee is expected to incorporate the changes into its budget, vote it and send it to the Senate floor.
Once approved, the Senate version of the budget returns to the House, which is expected to concur with some changes -- to give House members a chance to debate the big changes made because of the revenue shortfall.
Will there be the usual two weeks of budget negotiations between the House and Senate? That's not what seems to be planned -- not if lawmakers want to leave May 2.
Any bets on whether this process will work?
-- Nancy Remsen