burlingtonfreepress.com

Sponsored by:

vt.Buzz ~ a political blog

Political notes from Free Press staff writers Terri Hallenbeck, Sam Hemingway and Nancy Remsen


1.21.2009

 

Live coverage of gov's budget address

Tomorrow is the day Gov. Jim Douglas unveils his 2010 budget proposal. Vermonters will find out how he proposes to make up for a $150 million decline in revenues.

There will surely be layoffs of state employees, he has said, but how many and where? There will surely be cuts to programs that people consider untouchable, but which ones and how deep will the cuts be?

You can be among the first to find out by tuning in to live video coverage at www.burlingtonfreepress.com at 2 p.m. Thursday.

- Terri Hallenbeck

Comments:
I'll have a bottle of lube and a tissue ready.
 
Deb Markowitz for Governor
 
Think Douglas will man up and admit to his failure to lead and to make decisions since 2002 that could have prevented this mess? Not a chance.
 
And just where would you old financial wizard have made changes since 2002 to solve the current mess???

Just as I thought- you and Coop are Monday morning quarterbacks at best!
 
And you're not?
 
Notice Microsoft is laying off masses of employees because the haves who own stock aren't making enough profit. And just imagine, not in Vermont's hostile business climate! Greed anyone?
 
Is the session open? Can the public come watch?
 
To NEK:

With regard to unemployment insurance, I wouldn't have frozen Vermont's wage base at $8,000 for 20 years and missed all the revenue that would have come with increased tax levies.
 
Of course the public can come and watch. Tends to be crowded.
- TH
 
But fun
 
Yea, there is nothing quite as fun as listening to Jim Douglas give a long speach about the state budget.

Bring a can of Red Bull if you want to stay awake.
 
To anonymous on the unemployment cap- I agree with you that it should have changed gradually over the years- it was set at $8k long before Douglas' time. The rates have been escalating since 2002 so it wasn't completely ignored.
 
The point was your guy Jim chose to ignore it and not address it. What's his excuse?
 
Jim Douglas has singled out two groups as teh cause of our ills - 1) Schools and 2) State Workers.

Typical Douglas point a finger at someone else and say "it's their fault"
 
The fact is that Douglas' proposals for education is nothing more than a shift to local governemnts and more specifically an increase in taxes at the local level.
 
I love how Douglas glossed over the DMV "fee" increases he wants. Spineless s&^t can't even call it a tax.
 
oh come on. education spending is totally out of hand. how can costs rise 22% and student enrollment decline at 10%. Everyone needs to share the pain. Everyone. Maybe the time has come to get rid of all of the supervisory unions. what do they do anyway? More administraters. The money needs to be spent on the kids not on each supervisory union
\duplicating services. This is a very small state. Consolidation is the magic word
 
Consolodation would reduce education costs by less than 3%.

That's hardly going to put a dent in the increases seen recently.
 
Douglas wants to get involved with the decisions of local school boards then he should put forth some ideas.

Tell us, Governor, what should be cut from the school budgets ????
 
The teachers union!


Like Obama said - it is not weather it is big or small but does it work. If not get rid of it.
 
You think that the state should cut funding for the teacher's union?

That won't save much money since the Union isn't paid for by the State of Vermont.
 
... or the local school budgets.
 
"Consolodation would reduce education costs by less than 3%.
That's hardly going to put a dent in the increases seen recently."

Then cut the teaching staff in this time of declining enrollment, and cap teacher's salaries. And make the towns that approve budget increases pay into the teacher retirement fund. Currently, it is funded by the state, not by the Ed Fund.
 
Shumlin for Governor.
 
Oh, yeah!
 
Post a Comment



<< Home

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

June 2006   July 2006   August 2006   September 2006   October 2006   November 2006   December 2006   January 2007   February 2007   March 2007   April 2007   May 2007   June 2007   July 2007   August 2007   September 2007   October 2007   November 2007   December 2007   January 2008   February 2008   March 2008   April 2008   May 2008   June 2008   July 2008   August 2008   September 2008   October 2008   November 2008   December 2008   January 2009   February 2009   March 2009   April 2009   May 2009   June 2009   July 2009   August 2009   September 2009   October 2009   November 2009   December 2009   January 2010   February 2010   March 2010   April 2010