vt.Buzz ~ a political blog

Political notes from Free Press staff writers Terri Hallenbeck, Sam Hemingway and Nancy Remsen

3.28.2008

Leahy: Hillary should quit race

Sign up Patrick Leahy as another leading Democrat trying to send signals to Hillary Clinton that it's time for her to quit her quest for president.

Leahy is quoted today on Vermont Public Radio as saying Clinton's candidacy is doomed and that at this point, she's hurting the Barack Obama's and the party's chances of capturing the White House in November. Leahy officially came out for Obama in January, but it's been obvious who he was going to back since attending an Obama fundraiser in Norwich last summer.

Here's what Leahy said today: "There is no way that Senator Clinton is going to win enough delegates to get the nomination. She ought to withdraw and she ought to be backing Senator Obama. Now, obviously that's a decision that only she can make. Frankly, I feel that she would have a tremendous career in the Senate."

Leahy also said the longer the Obama-Clinton battle goes on, the more it helps the presumptive Republican nominee, John McCain: "John McCain, who has been making one gaffe after another, is getting a free ride on it because Senator Obama and Senator Clinton have to fight with each other. I think that her criticism is hurting him more than anything John McCain has said. I think that's unfortunate."

Listen to VPR's interview with Leahy here: http://www.vpr.net/news_detail/79888/

The let's-rally-behind-Obama drumbeat has gotten distinctively louder in recent days.

New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson threw his support to Obama a week ago and Pennsylvania Sen. Bob Casey is doing so tody. Yesterday Connecticut Sen. Chris Dodd said he thought Obama had already won the race, for all intents and purposes.

And old friend Howard Dean, the chairman of the Democratic National Committee, said in an Associated Press interview today he's worried that the increasingly personal battle between Obama and Clinton is demoralizing the Democratic base and thereby hurting the chances for victory in November.

Then again, the voters of Pennsylvania, North Carolina and Indiana haven't had a chance to have their say, and the polls show Clinton remains competitive in all three states and ahead by double digits in Pa.

So what do you think. Should Hillary get out or go on?

-- Sam Hemingway

posted by vt.Buzz | 10:36 AM |

Comments:

The Washington Times is reporting that Jim Douglas is on John McCain's short list for Vice President.

Crazy world.

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 11:36 AM, March 28, 2008

Second place isn't so bad-Hillary should ride it out. The more we hear about Obama, the more chance she has- maybe she should talk to her pastor!

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 11:40 AM, March 28, 2008

With Douglas as vice-president, maybe McCain will take VT and be a shoo-in for Pres!!

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 11:45 AM, March 28, 2008

Douglas has zero name recognition and is a political lightweight to boot. McCain's folks know better than to nominate Lil' Jimmy. My guess is they are floating his name to stroke his giant ego and insure he campiagns hard for the old man in true blue Vermont.

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 11:50 AM, March 28, 2008

Anonymous said...

"The Washington Times is reporting that Jim Douglas is on John McCain's short list for Vice President."

The WT, eh?

Gee, couldn't ya find a legitimate newspaper, little fella?

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 12:49 PM, March 28, 2008

NEW said...

"With Douglas as vice-president, maybe McCain will take VT and be a shoo-in for Pres!!"

Yeah, and maybe gas will be 79cents per gallon by Halloween, too, little fella.

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 12:54 PM, March 28, 2008

Douglas has foreign policy experience -- speaks Russian and has studied the country extensively.

Douglas's former top advisor James Barnett is now a top advisor to McCain.

Douglas is a RED governor in a BLUE state ... and could help McCain to win other BLUE New England states like Maine and Mass.

He's good on the stump. Personable. Good memory. Tireless campaigner.

Douglas has helped raise a lot of money for McCain already.

Douglas's endorsement of McCain just before the critical New Hampshire Primary helps a lot too.

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 1:31 PM, March 28, 2008

"Douglas's endorsement of McCain just before the critical New Hampshire Primary helps a lot too."

Really? I thought NH held the nation's first primary, or is your wet dream Douglas a time traveler too?

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 1:36 PM, March 28, 2008

As I said, Douglas endorsed McCain before just before the critical New Hampshire primary.

Now what are you going on about?

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 1:42 PM, March 28, 2008

The people in those states yet to hold primaries should have their say in whether Hillary should drop out or not. Just because Leahy says she should drop out is all the more reason to stay in until the people of the US say that Obama has won the right of the nomination. This country is still run by the democratic process of for the people, by the people, not by party bosses.

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 1:44 PM, March 28, 2008

Douglas would be a great choice. He has a ton of experience collecting government checks and doing nothing.

It's like he was made for the Vice Presidency.

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 1:55 PM, March 28, 2008

True That!

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 2:21 PM, March 28, 2008

Speaking of VP's- the guy who thinks the sky is falling may be the Demo's peacemaker- all because HD can't get it done!

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 3:18 PM, March 28, 2008

Coop
It's obvious that you are a very astute political analyst- I can tell by your rhetoric. Too bad your Obama's adviser!! Can't wait to see you on CNN.

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 4:19 PM, March 28, 2008

Coop,
HD is in the big leagues now and no body listens to him- especially after he throws tantrums. He told MI & FL what to do on their primaries and they threw him the digit. If you think he has it all fixed then you must be smokin'.

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 4:40 PM, March 28, 2008

NEK has left a new comment on the post "Leahy: Hillary should quit race":

Coop,

"HD is in the big leagues now and no body listens to him- especially after he throws tantrums."

Yeah, that must be why the Dems regained Congress in '06 along with big gains in control of State Houses and State Legislatures, schmuck.

That 50-State Strategy of his really backfired big time, little factually-challenged fella.

So, does your face wanna launch any more attacks on my foot or have ya spit enough bloody chicklets and gotten it out of your system for the moment, deduce bagalow?

Nice try. He's in the bigs and you're still spewin' this thoroughly-discredited, brain-dead bush-league BS of yours.

"He told MI & FL what to do on their primaries and they threw him the digit."

Actually, the digit would be what the Country through Rudy, Fred T, Huck Finnished and Mitt-Wit Romney, little fella.

In other words, they violated the rules, held early primaries and now they want a mulligan and he's saying not so fast.

Florida's gops cheneyed that mess up as gops always do. I like

Nice try.

"If you think he has it all fixed then you must be smokin'."

His problems can be fixed. McCain's are terminal.

So are yours.

Dismissed.

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 5:58 PM, March 28, 2008

McCain / Douglas '08

Because 4,000 dead soldiers isn't enough.

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 11:16 PM, March 28, 2008

Clinton should stay in until all states have had their say. Decision by July 1st as Dean has suggested is the fair was to go and plenty of time to mend fences before the general election.

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 7:59 AM, March 29, 2008

Anonymous has left a new comment on the post "Leahy: Hillary should quit race":

"Clinton should stay in until all states have had their say. Decision by July 1st as Dean has suggested is the fair was to go and plenty of time to mend fences before the general election."

Nice try, flush.

Dismissed.

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 8:10 AM, March 29, 2008

No candidate has a right to force another to quit before all citizens have had an opportunity to vote. McCain's race is over because he has the required number of delegates. Neither candidate has in the Democratic race. Those are facts, like them or not.

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 8:17 AM, March 29, 2008

Not enough for nameless-nitwits and brain-dead bushleaguers.

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 8:28 AM, March 29, 2008

Anonymous said...

"No candidate has a right to force another to quit before all citizens have had an opportunity to vote."

Nice try, nitwit. Who said they did? Feel free to point out just where and when Leahy or anyone else said anything to the contrary, flush.

That's what I thought.

People have the right to eat pizza and donuts 24/7 while spewing racist-rubbish and neo-nazi slop to ignorant, ill-informed ditto heads on their radio shows as you so clearly demonstrate.

That doesn't make it a good idea.

"McCain's race is over because he has the required number of delegates. Neither candidate has in the Democratic race. Those are facts, like them or not."

Nice try, schmuck. If Hillary wins 11 straight and Obama loses 11 straight, she's got a shot.

Unfortunately for Hillary, McCain and your dim-witted ditto-heads, there's only 10 left.

No more free rides for doddering old men telling tales of TR coming straight from San Juan Hill to his Daddy's house to bounce him on his knee and tell him all about it.

This is no Country for Clueless Old Men.

We've seen that movie with Reagan.

Dismissed

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 8:45 AM, March 29, 2008

Actually it is Obama and his supporters, like Leahy, who are demanding that Clinton quit. Check any liberal blog; Leahy announced it on national television an others a pushing as hard as they can to achieve this. These are facts, also.

I am not a McCain supporter, nor did I support Clinton.

McCain's rivals dropped out because they chose to; Clinton has not so chosen and should not be forced out for the convenience of Obama. Any candidate has a right to compete until it's over.

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 8:57 AM, March 29, 2008

State primaries continue into June; these are facts. The convention is not until late summer. Why should these states be denied their right to express their preferences?

I know what it is like to be on the way to a polling place to cast my vote for president and hear that someone has already conceded based upon polls in other states. That is disenfranchisement. But not as bad as having one candidate block your state from having a say in the process as is being done in Florida and Michigan.

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 9:07 AM, March 29, 2008

This comment has been removed by the author.

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 10:03 AM, March 29, 2008

JWCoop10 said...

Anonymous has left a new comment on the post "Leahy: Hillary should quit race":

"Actually it is Obama and his supporters, like Leahy, who are demanding that Clinton quit."

Then I'm sure you'll have no problem actually showing me just when and where he said it, little factually-challenged fella.

That's what I thought.

This is what he said:

"There is no way that Senator Clinton is going to win enough delegates to get the nomination. She ought to withdraw and she ought to be backing Senator Obama. Now, obviously that's a decision that only she can make. Frankly, I feel that she would have a tremendous career in the Senate."

Just which part of that is givin' you trouble, little lyin'-slime fella?

Just how is "Now, obviously that's a decision that only she can make..." denying her the right to run and disenfranchising the voters, little factually-challenged fella?

That's what I thought.

Ya got bupkis, schmuck.

Once again, you prove yourself to be dumb, scum and a waste of oxygen.

Disappear.

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 10:07 AM, March 29, 2008

It isn't simply that people are talking about it; the venom is unbelievable and allwhohave power to dosomething about it are: exmaple, the Obama campaign's refusal to consider a revote of any kind for two very large states with a lot of delegates because that type of state has gone to Clinton. The refusal to consider a revote on the part of Obama's campaign is a fact. Leahy's attempt to use his status is also a fact.
You are the one lacking facts; youare operating opnly on the basis of emotion in support of your favored candidate. Try a little objectivity.

In the instance of Florida and Michigan, do you wonder they tried to jump the order of scheduled primaries? Look what happens to those who vote late. They don't get to vote at all.

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 10:12 AM, March 29, 2008

Leahy's comment that you quoted was backtracking after the fact; it was not a part of his initial statement That is also a fact.

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 10:22 AM, March 29, 2008

Dude, don't read what JW writes.

It's just a waste of time.

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 10:24 AM, March 29, 2008

Anonymous said...

State primaries continue into June; these are facts. The convention is not until late summer. Why should these states be denied their right to express their preferences?"

"Anonymous said...
State primaries continue into June; these are facts.

So do gop primaries in those States, schmuck. Are they being denied their right to vote?

"The convention is not until late summer. Why should these states be denied their right to express their preferences?

When's the gop convention, little factually-challenged/fundamentally-dishonest fella?

That's what I thought.

"I know what it is like to be on the way to a polling place to cast my vote for president and hear that someone has already conceded based upon polls in other states. That is disenfranchisement."

Ah, the ol' fox noise "the Florida Panhandle folks were deprived of their votes" song and dance.

No sale, schmuck. The polls remained open. No one was prevented from voting. You chose not to bother.

You weren't disenfranchised. You're just a lazy, lying, lousy American Citizen, schmuck.

Disappear.

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 10:30 AM, March 29, 2008

Anonymous said...

"Leahy's comment that you quoted was backtracking after the fact; it was not a part of his initial statement That is also a fact."

Then I'm sure you'll have no trouble coughin' up the evidence to substantiate your ignorant slop, little factually-challenged/fundamentally-dishonest fella.

That's what I thought.

If ya can't make your case without lying your ignorant ass off, ya got no case, schmuck.

Clearly, you can't.

That's a fact.

Ya got bupkis, schmuck.

Disappear.

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 10:37 AM, March 29, 2008

If Leahy's comment was seized upon and mischaracterized in the mainstream media where it did get national attention who benefitted from that?

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 10:55 AM, March 29, 2008

I notice no denial of Obama's refusal to allow a re-vote in Michigan and Florida. Again, that is a fact.

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 10:58 AM, March 29, 2008

I notice no denial of Obama's refusal to allow a re-vote in Michigan and Florida. Again, that is a fact.

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 10:58 AM, March 29, 2008

"on my way to a polling place..."
Wrong again. It happened in a general election for president and in
the state of California. It's verifiable that that happened. Again you have no facts.

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 11:04 AM, March 29, 2008

Anonymous has left a new comment on the post "Leahy: Hillary should quit race":

"It isn't simply that people are talking about it; the venom is unbelievable and allwhohave power to dosomething about it are: exmaple, the Obama campaign's refusal to consider a revote of any kind for two very large states with a lot of delegates because that type of state has gone to Clinton. The refusal to consider a revote on the part of Obama's campaign is a fact. Leahy's attempt to use his status is also a fact"

Well, you've certainly got your factually-challenged/fundamentally-dishonest talking points down, little fella.

Too bad you've got no factual evidence.

Your ignorant trash with bupkis credentials remain impeccable.

Again, your ability to spew ignorant gop-slop with no basis in fact is not in dispute, little fella. I never doubted your ignorance and fundamental-dishonesty for a second, schmuck.

"You are the one lacking facts; youare operating opnly on the basis of emotion in support of your favored candidate."

Really? So is it your contention that Leahy didn't say:

"There is no way that Senator Clinton is going to win enough delegates to get the nomination. She ought to withdraw and she ought to be backing Senator Obama. Now, obviously that's a decision that only she can make. Frankly, I feel that she would have a tremendous career in the Senate."

Is it your contention that the BFP article this thread is allegedly based on was not reported and published?

Are you accusing Hemingway and the BFP of fabricating quotes here, little fella?

Leahy said it, Hemingway quoted him and the BFP published it.

Just which of those facts are you disputing, little fella?

That's what I thought. You're lyin' scum, schmuck. That's a fact.

Try a little objectivity."

Try comin' up with some factual evidence, schmuck.

"In the instance of Florida and Michigan, do you wonder they tried to jump the order of scheduled primaries? Look what happens to those who vote late. They don't get to vote at all."

Nice try. Both States knew the rules. They violated them. In Michigan's case, they've got no one to blame but themselves.

Florida was screwed over by a gop governor and a gop legislature.

If Florida Gops want to run another election at Florida Gop expense, let them propose it to the Dems and see what happens.

That's what I thought.

And your evidence that the polls in those States won't be open to those who choose to vote is...?

That's what I thought.

Nice try, flush. Ya got bupkis.
You're ignorant trash spewing factually-challenged/fundamentally-dishonest gop-slop talking points because some lard-butted, Anti-American, Oxy-Moron, trash-talk radio host told ya to, little fella.

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 11:24 AM, March 29, 2008

Anonymous said...

"If Leahy's comment was seized upon and mischaracterized in the mainstream media where it did get national attention who benefitted from that?"

McCain and the gops.

Does your face want to launch any more preemptive strikes on my foot or have ya spit enough bloody chicklets for the moment, little fella?

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 11:29 AM, March 29, 2008

Anonymous said...
"on my way to a polling place..."

"Wrong again." It happened in a general election for president and in the state of California. It's verifiable that that happened."

Then feel free to verify it, little fella.

That's what I thought.

"Again you have no facts."

And again you have no case.

Disappear.

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 11:40 AM, March 29, 2008

SI think looking at it objectively the person with the most to gain by Leahy's comment is Obama. That's obvious and doesn't require an explanation. If you think it is McCain responsible for the "misquote", then you are saying that Clinton is the stronger candidate and that McCain's campaign thinks that too. Hence, their trying to make her quit. Think about that logically.

Of course Michigan and Florida will vote in the general election. They have no say in choosing the candidate of their own party as you have had. That's the point. And that is why allstates will be vying for first in order next time as they have had this time. States who vote late will have no say and will simply have to rubber stamp someone else's choice as you want them to do this time.
Honestly, you have to admit that it's about votes, not procedure, this time. Howard Dean and the Committee who sanctioned them are willing to work things out. It is only the Obama campaign who is not, and they have the most to gain by keeping these states from voting.

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 11:42 AM, March 29, 2008

jw rants: "Then I'm sure you'll have no problem actually showing me just when and where he said it, little factually-challenged fella.

Good point. You have never said anything in any of these posts, or on any thread...ever.

...I'm Barack Obama and I approved this posting.

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 11:50 AM, March 29, 2008

"on my way to the polls"

NY Times on 1980 general election: Carter concedes before polls close in California." Lookit up for the details. Again you have no facts.

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 11:51 AM, March 29, 2008

Anonymous has left a new comment on the post "Leahy: Hillary should quit race":

"I notice no denial of Obama's refusal to allow a re-vote in Michigan and Florida. Again, that is a fact."

Ah, the ol' I've got bupkis, so I'm gonna try to change the subject and hope nobody notices," song and dance.

I noticed. Ya got bupkis.

Anonymous said...

"Leahy's comment that you quoted was backtracking after the fact; it was not a part of his initial statement That is also a fact."

Anonymous said...

"Leahy's comment that you quoted was backtracking after the fact; it was not a part of his initial statement That is also a fact."

Then I'm sure you'll have no trouble coughin' up the evidence to substantiate your ignorant slop, little factually-challenged/fundamentally-dishonest fella.

I'm still not seein' any evidence, little fella.

That's a fact.

The offer still stands, schmuck.

So does my statement.

Those are facts.

Dismissed.

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 11:53 AM, March 29, 2008

Hillary should drop out if for no other reason than to distance herself from the Democrat loons, not the least of which are Leahy and JW(toss in Bernie S. for fun).

Why would a successful intelligent pol like Hillary want to be associated with their left-wing agenda and rants?

I think she should choose a top flight VP and run as an independent. She could be the first viable alternative to step up against the Dims and GOP in a long, long time. That would make the election interesting.

Captain America

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 11:59 AM, March 29, 2008

You haven't disproved any facts I have stated. My responses are thereand go unchallenged except for comments like "disappear." You've got todo better than that.

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 12:01 PM, March 29, 2008

Anonymous said...

"jw rants: "Then I'm sure you'll have no problem actually showing me just when and where he said it, little factually-challenged fella."

"Good point. You have never said anything in any of these posts, or on any thread...ever."

You just did it for me, schmuck.

Again.

As ignorant nameless-nitwit trash with bupkis goes, you're very thoughtful that way.

Much obliged, little fella.

"...I'm Barack Obama and I approved this posting."

No, you're ignorant trash with bupkis, little fella.

Ya always are.

Dismissed.

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 12:03 PM, March 29, 2008

All this talk about forcing Hillary out seems wrong. Why force out our first viable woman presidential candidate? But then on the good side, it looks like Barack isn't up for a first class political battle. If he can't handle the Cinton machine wait until the mean ol' GOP gets a hold on him.

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 12:48 PM, March 29, 2008

JW = empty suit

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 12:49 PM, March 29, 2008

Anonymous has left a new comment on the post "Leahy: Hillary should quit race":

"You haven't disproved any facts I have stated"

I haven't had to. You haven't stated any.

The only thing you've been unable to prove in the 5 months I've been here is your inability to prove anything.

Ya sold me, schmuck.

You're ignorant trash with bupkis.

So stipulated. Ya get no argument from me on that score.

Again, it's not up to Hillary to prove she didn't murder Vince Foster. It's up to the ignorant trash likes of you to prove that she did.

You can't.

You keep claiming Leahy said something he didn't say.

I show ya the quote and offer you the opportunity to point out just where and when he said what you claim he said.

Ya can't do that either.

You can't throw strikes. That's your problem. I'm under no obligation to swing the bat when ya keep throwing it over the back stop, schmuck.

"My responses are thereand go unchallenged except for comments like "disappear." You've got todo better than that."

I do, eh?

Your responses are ignorant slop with no basis in fact, schmuck.

Again, you made the allegation. The burden is on your ignorant ass to substantiate it. That is a fact.

Clearly, you can't. That, too, is a fact.

Once again, little factually-challenged/fundamentally-dishonest fella, here in the real world, I'm under no obligation to disprove what you've yet to prove schmuck.

Neither is anyone else.

Unless and until you demonstrate the ability to make your case, you remain wholly without merit: factually, legally and logically.

Dismissed.

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 1:12 PM, March 29, 2008

Anonymous said...

"JW = empty suit"

Ignorant, anonymous trash with bupkis = empty head.

Dismissed.

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 1:15 PM, March 29, 2008

JW says "blah, blah, blah"

Bupkis from Dr. Bupkis

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 1:16 PM, March 29, 2008

Anonymous said...

"All this talk about forcing Hillary out seems wrong. Why force out our first viable woman presidential candidate?"

Who's forcing her out, little factually-challenged fella?

"But then on the good side, it looks like Barack isn't up for a first class political battle."

Really? What's he in now, schmuck?

"If he can't handle the Clinton machine wait until the mean ol' GOP gets a hold on him."

As if. He knows he's gonna get swift-boated by the ignorant trash and racist scum that is the republklan party, schmuck.

It's not like you can run on your record, little flush fella.

You've been doin' it with this Reverend Wright rubbish and ya haven't laid a glove on him.

Unless some clueless cracker shoots him for Jesus, he's your next President, little fella. Deal with it or take the rat line to Argentina with the rest of the old nazis.

Dismissed.

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 1:30 PM, March 29, 2008

JW spews; " He knows he's gonna get swift-boated by the ignorant trash and racist scum that is the republklan party, schmuck."

Interesting that you refer to those opposed to BO as a racist and then immediately suggest some 'cracker' could shoot him.
Silly me but the last I knew the term cracker was also a derogatory term offensive to many in the South today and I think the Republican Party may take exception with your broad brushing them as racist scum. Any specific proof of their racist actions or is this just more of your unsubstantiated opinion?

Go stand in line with Rev. Wright and Jesse Jackson please. They can teach you phrases you don't have in your vocabulary today like garlic noses and hymie town and you can teach them your greatest hits like schmuck, scum and cracker.

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 1:42 PM, March 29, 2008

Anonymous said...

"Hillary should drop out if for no other reason than to distance herself from the Democrat loons, not the least of which are Leahy and JW(toss in Bernie S. for fun)."

Hey, it's not like ya can do it for real, mein Herr.

How 'bout them high gas prices/let's stick with what ain't workin'!! could be a tough sell, Captain UnAmerican.

It's no wonder you want to avoid the facts and reality like the plague. You loons don't fare well in the light of day.

So, Leahy is a loon, eh? Tell me, little factually-challenged/irrational fear of a black president fella, if he's such a loon, how come Vermont keeps sending him back to the Senate since 1974?

Clearly, most Vermonters don't share your assessment of the Senior Senator from the State of Vermont.

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 2:01 PM, March 29, 2008

A couple thoughts, Einstein....

Nixon must have been a great president in your estimation. Gas prices were dramatically lower then when compared to either the Carter or the Clinton Admin. Gas prices are driven by a series of global factors unrelated to Bush....how much more oil is China buying today -v- 10 years ago?

About Leahy....birds of a feather flock together. Loons attract loons. Don't know what else to say Coopy.

As far as avoiding fact, you haven't put one up in all the time you have been here. Once again, insults stopped qualifying as facts some time after third grade.

You continue to look like the only racist on the board with your Mein Herr and cracker references.

Unrelated but enquiring minds do want to know, did you take up the Honorable Mayor of Tuscaloosa and visit his fair city?

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 2:56 PM, March 29, 2008

Let's see the Bush admin ignores Leahy's supeonas and Hillary ignores his pleas for her to stop.

I see a trend emerging. No one listens to poor ol' Pat.

No juice!

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 4:44 PM, March 29, 2008

Anonymous said...
JW spews; " He knows he's gonna get swift-boated by the ignorant trash and racist scum that is the republklan party, schmuck."

Nameless nitwit with bupkis pukes:

"Interesting that you refer to those opposed to BO as a racist and then immediately suggest some 'cracker' could shoot him."

Well, little fella, seein' how we're less than a week away from the 40th Anniversary of MLK's Assassination in Memphis, it's been known to happen.

It's gonna be tough for the factually-challenged/fundamentally-dishonest/ ignorant-trash likes of you to convince anyone that it hasn't, but you've never let the facts slow ya down before, I don't expect you to quit while you're losin' now, either.

So, is it your contention that James Earl Jones wasn't white, little factually-challenged fella?

How about Byron delay Beckwith?

Edgar Ray Killen?

Knock yourself out, nitwit.

"Silly me but the last I knew the term cracker was also a derogatory term offensive to many in the South today and I think the Republican Party may take exception with your broad brushing them as racist scum."

Gee, that's a shame. I better put on another pot of coffee so I can stay awake to tell you how much sleep that's costin' me, schmuck.

Again, ya wanna tell me that James Earl Jones, Byron de lay Beckwith and Edgar Ray Killen weren't white sons of the South, knock yourself out.

If the Gops don't run the Confederate Table, they can't get close enough to steal it, little fella. That's a fact.

Racist Scum like Strom became Gops or they died, little factually-challenged fella.

Goldwater carried 6 States in '64, punk. Five of 'em were in Dixie. In fact, he ran stronger in Dixie than he did in his home State of Arizona.

That's a fact. Actually, it's at least 6 of them.

No racists. No reagan.

No bigots. No bush.

"Any specific proof of their racist actions or is this just more of your unsubstantiated opinion?"

Nah, I leave that stuff to your ignorant ass, little fella.

You're pretty well cheneyed six ways to Sunday when the facts enter the picture, schmuck.

What percentage of the Black Vote did Bush get in 2000? 2004? Do ya think Katrina helped or hurt him with Black Voters? How's about the Jena 6 situation?

"Go stand in line with Rev. Wright and Jesse Jackson please. They can teach you phrases you don't have in your vocabulary today like garlic noses and hymie town and you can teach them your greatest hits like schmuck, scum and cracker."

Oy, what a farcockteh meshuggah putz.

In addition to schmuck, schmuck, those are Yiddish Terms.

Is it your contention that Yiddish terms are commonly held by the Racist, Anti-Semitic, Bigoted-trash slime comprising the Klan and other "Christian, Traditional-Values-Preserving" gop-leaning organizations, little fella?

Knock yourself out.

Reagan kicked off his General Election Campaign for President in Philadelphia, MS. where he proudly proclaimed his support for State's Rights at the Neshoba County Fair.

Philadelphia is where 3 Civil Rights Workers were murdered by the Klan in '64. Schwerner, Chaney and Goodman. Two Jews from NYC aka "Hymie Town" and a Black Kid.

Those are facts, schmuck.

The "Christian, Traditional-Values-Preserving" Klan don't like Jews or Catholics any better than Blacks, schmuck.

The Klan endorsed Reagan. Those are facts, schmuck.

I've got my problems with Jesse Jackson, but he made a stupid remark in 1984 which he subsequently apologized for and rightfully so, but at the end of the day, I'll stand with him and Wright over the likes of bigoted trash like Franklin Graham, Pat Robertson, Haggard, Hagee, Perkins and and the rest of the Bigoted-Trash Taliban supporting the GOP any day.

Jackson and Wright never tried to herd us into Cattle Cars bound for Auschwitz any more than we tried to lynch him in the name of Jesus.

Gops like Strom, Jesse and Trent are a another story.

Reagan made a career cultivating the votes of racist trash because he knew he couldn't win without them. No gop gets near the WH without the brain-dead bigot vote.

Sheet, the likes of you and Anthony Pollina are the only thing keepin' the jimi douglas experience afloat, little fella.

The Modern Republiklan Party is built on racism and ignorant bigotry.

Without racism, Anti-Semitism and ignorant bigotry in all forms, like your pathetic case, there's no there there.

Dismissed.

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 4:47 PM, March 29, 2008

Anonymous has left a new comment on the post "Leahy: Hillary should quit race":

"About Leahy....birds of a feather flock together."

Yeah, winners win, Vermonters vote Vermont Values and you've got Bupkis, little fella.

Lifelong GOPs like Jim Jeffords don't leave the republiklan party for nothin', little factually-challenged fella.

"Loons attract loons. Don't know what else to say Coopy."

You're ignorant trash with bupkis, schmuck. Ya never did. Ya never do. Ya never will.

Still, I'm pleased to see you've finally faced that fact and admitted it. Good for you. I'm proud of ya, little fella.

As ignorant trash with bupkis goes, you're a credit to your sub-species.

Dismissed.

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 5:19 PM, March 29, 2008

Anonymous said...

"Let's see the Bush admin ignores Leahy's supeonas and Hillary ignores his pleas for her to stop.

I see a trend emerging. No one listens to poor ol' Pat.

No juice!"

Nice try, little factually-challenged fella. Unfortunately, the trend of you being ignorant trash with bupkis continues.

On the bright side, based on the TM results and the polls, nobody buys your ignorant slop.

Dismissed.

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 5:30 PM, March 29, 2008

Anonymous has left a new comment on the post "Leahy: Hillary should quit race":

"Dude, don't read what JW writes.

It's just a waste of time. "

No, but it's a death sentence for ignorant trash with bupkis.

Given those facts, I can see why you'd prefer a more nameless-nitwit-friendly neighborhood, little factually-challenged fella.

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 5:42 PM, March 29, 2008

I'm a woman voting for Hilary. I wish all these experts like Pat Leahy would just shut up and wait until all the primarys take place. If Hillary isn't the Dem nominee I'm voting for McCain. Not because of this long primary race that the experts say is bad for the Dems, but because I think McCain is the 2nd best candidate!!! I know lots of voters like myself. Tired of the talking heads on TV Go Hillary!!

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 5:54 PM, March 29, 2008

Coop
You forgot the Grand Wizard Robert Byrd- and King of PORK- I don't believe he voted for Reagan.

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 6:11 PM, March 29, 2008

NEK said...
Coop

"You forgot the Grand Wizard Robert Byrd- and King of PORK- I don't believe he voted for Reagan."

Nah, but his evil twin Ted Stevens did, little factually-challenged fella.

Nice try, nitwit. Ya wanna trade names with klan ties and racist pasts, knock yourself out.

You'll be out of ammo before I'm even warmed-up, punk.

Byrd has a history of Klan ties. He also has a history of denouncing them. If you've got any evidence to the contrary, as always, feel free to cough it up.

Trent Lott, on the other hand, has a recent history of singin' the praises of scum like Strom, his White-Supremacist '48 run for President and and assorted schmucks in sheets like the Conservative Citizens Council - AKA, The upscale racist trash artists formerly known as the White Citizens Council.

That not only gives him a racist past, it gives him a racist present.

Again, ya wanna trade names, knock yourself out. I'll see ya and call your bupkis-spewin' ignorant ass all day and all night, schmuck.

In fact, I look forward to it.

It's always a pleasure.

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 6:47 PM, March 29, 2008

Anonymous said...

"I'm a woman voting for Hilary."

No you're ignorant, anonymous trash who can't spell Hillary, schmuck.

Thanks for playing. We have some lovely parting gifts for ya.

Dismissed.

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 6:53 PM, March 29, 2008

amazing how much time JW has to write foolish garbage on blogs.

it's sad, really.

save yourself a lot of time ... don't read his crap.

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 1:42 AM, March 30, 2008

Go cheney yourself, schmuck.

It's not meant for nameless-nitwits with bupkis

Too bad there's no one else here.

Dismissed.

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 7:13 AM, March 30, 2008

Endearing words from Dr. Bupkis himself.

After having read through a collection of JW's greatest hits it is clear that he alone is the true racist hate-monger on this board.... insult upon insult, hateful discurse and unproven conspiracy after conspiracy theory. He is a pitiful lost child that deserves our sympathy.

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 11:00 AM, March 30, 2008

Okay, back to the thread, namely Hillary's status in the Democratic Primary race. Admittedly, I'm not following it beyond media coverage and reading about it on blogs, so I have a question.

Isn't this the reason why the superdelegate system was implemented? So a set of qualified political activists could make a determination of which candidate was the better one regardless of the popular vote of the Party base?

If Hillary can still win, even if it is with the aid of the superdelegates, shouldn't she stay in the race and let the system work this out?

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 11:19 AM, March 30, 2008

Anonymous has left a new comment on the post "Leahy: Hillary should quit race":

Endearing words from Dr. Bupkis himself.

"After having read through a collection of JW's greatest hits it is clear that he alone is the true racist hate-monger on this board...."

Really? How so, little factually-challenged/lyin'-slime fella?

"...insult upon insult, hateful discurse and unproven conspiracy after conspiracy theory. He is a pitiful lost child that deserves our sympathy."

Nice try, little fella. You certainly deserve my laughter, ridicule and scorn with that brain-dead BS.

You're ignorant trash, punk. There is nothing remotely legitimate or worthy of debate about you or your neo-nazi nonsense.

Dismissed.

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 3:44 PM, March 30, 2008

bupkis

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 5:20 PM, March 30, 2008

Once again JW trashes his own post. Slow down and take your meds Dr. B. If things don't come back into focus, go upstairs and tell Mom.

BTW...The only racist hateful things being said here are coming from you.

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 6:46 PM, March 30, 2008

Let Hillary have her day- hopefully she won't use coop as her spokesperson.

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 8:36 PM, March 30, 2008

yawn.... the facts are look at the sequence of your posts dummy.

Ya got no case. Ya got no clue. You're ignorant, racist, bigoted trash with no factual support for your illegitimate-trash "point of view."

There is no factual foundation for your case, schmuck. There never was. There never will be.

There is nothing remotely legitimate about you or your point of view.

You're just ignorant, bigoted trash with bupkis.

Disappear.

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 1:13 AM, March 31, 2008

If we had a progressive party candidate running for president we would not have this problem. Months ago they would have brow beat the democrats to not even run anybody in the race.

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 6:24 AM, March 31, 2008

All anonymous slime, all the time.

Anonymous has left a new comment on the post "Leahy: Hillary should quit race":

"If we had a progressive party candidate running for president we would not have this problem. Months ago they would have brow beat the democrats to not even run anybody in the race."

Nice try, delusional deducebagg.

You're lyin' slime and ignorant trash, schmuck.

Now you're reduced to stealing my lines and claiming I'm trashing my own posts when I'm responding to a series of nameless-nitwit nonsense posts.

Once again, the facts don't support your nameless-nitwit nonsense. There is nothing legitimate about you or your neo-nazi POV.

Nothing. Nada. Zip. Bupkis.

Disappear.

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 8:18 AM, March 31, 2008

Another contradiction from Barack O.(see the article below). What do you really know about this guy? Just another lying Chicago Politician.....

Captain America

________________________
from Politico.com

Obama had greater role on liberal survey
By KENNETH P. VOGEL | 3/31/08 4:35 AM EST Text Size:

But the questionnaires provide fodder to question BarackObama’s ideological consistency and electability.
Photo: AP

During his first run for elected office, Barack Obama played a greater role than his aides now acknowledge in crafting liberal stands on gun control, the death penalty and abortion — positions that appear at odds with the more moderate image he has projected during his presidential campaign.

The evidence comes from an amended version of an Illinois voter group’s detailed questionnaire, filed under his name during his 1996 bid for a state Senate seat.

Late last year, in response to a Politico story about Obama’s answers to the original questionnaire, his aides said he “never saw or approved” the questionnaire.

They asserted the responses were filled out by a campaign aide who “unintentionally mischaracterize[d] his position.”

But a Politico examination determined that Obama was actually interviewed about the issues on the questionnaire by the liberal Chicago nonprofit group that issued it. And it found that Obama — the day after sitting for the interview — filed an amended version of the questionnaire, which appears to contain Obama’s own handwritten notes added to one answer.

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 11:13 AM, March 31, 2008

Anonymous has left a new comment on the post "Leahy: Hillary should quit race":

"Another contradiction from Barack O.(see the article below). What do you really know about this guy? Just another lying Chicago Politician.....

Captain America"

Nice try, Kaptain UnAmerica.

We know he didn't: fall asleep at the switch and allow the 9/11 attacks, lie us into a War in Iraq, wreck the economy, trash the Military, allow Building 18 at Walter Reed, allow a massive security breech at the VA and fill key posts with incompetent political hacks.

We also know that he played no role in the Keating Five Scandal and didn't spew the same Al Qaeda/Iran lie 4 times in 24 hours about Iraq until his wing-man Lieberman corrected him.

Finally, we know your non-stop racist attacks on him haven't made a dent or laid a glove on him.

You're ignorant trash with bupkis,
Herr Hate-speech.

Disappear.

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 1:37 PM, March 31, 2008

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 1:37 PM, March 31, 2008

POLLINA should get out of the Governor's race!

He can't win!

This is about his ego - and nothing else!

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 3:21 PM, March 31, 2008

Gee, no kiddin'.

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 4:51 PM, March 31, 2008

and make way for the Dream Team ....colby aqnd coop

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 5:34 PM, March 31, 2008

Yeah, you're ignorant, anonymous trash with bupkis. Ya can stuff a sock in it. Ya made the sale.

Now be a good little nameless-nitwit and go cheney yourself, chump.

Disafookinpear.

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 5:41 PM, March 31, 2008

Anonymous said...

"and make way for the Dream Team ....colby aqnd coop"

Nameless-nitwit and nameless-nitwit.

Disappear.

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 6:26 PM, March 31, 2008

JW, what cartoon show did you learn the word 'bupkis' from?

You are a true entertainer

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 7:02 PM, March 31, 2008

Anonymous has left a new comment on the post "Leahy: Hillary should quit race":

"JW, what cartoon show did you learn the word 'bupkis' from?"

The one where ignorant gops pretend to be human beings capable of walking erect, schmuck.

"You are a true entertainer"

Gee, thanks, little fella.

You're ignorant trash with bupkis.

Disappear.

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 7:20 PM, March 31, 2008

I am just learning what you have known for some timed now JW. A simple copy and paste save a lot of time doesn't it. Those NYU computer classes are really paying off huh....

Ya got no case. Ya got no clue. You're ignorant, racist, bigoted trash. There is no factual support for your illegitimate-trash "point of view".

There is no factual foundation for your case, schmuck. There never was. There never will be.

There is nothing remotely legitimate about you or your point of view.

You're just ignorant, bigoted trash with bupkis.

Disappear.

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 8:09 PM, March 31, 2008

Anonymous said...

Way ahead of ya, schmuck.

As a stroll down memory lane courtesy of the BFP archives clearly demonstrates, your ignorant trash with bupkis, brain-dead bona fides were well-established long before I got here, deducebagg.

Dismissed.

Ya got no case. Ya got no clue. You're ignorant, racist, bigoted trash. There is no factual support for your illegitimate-trash "point of view".

There is no factual foundation for your case, schmuck. There never was. There never will be.

There is nothing remotely legitimate about you or your point of view.

You're just ignorant, bigoted trash with bupkis.

Disappear.

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 8:39 PM, March 31, 2008

As always, thanks for the kind words, Dr. B.

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 9:07 PM, March 31, 2008

Me thinks JWcoop10 doth protest to much regarding white trash and other view points.

Nothing is more ignorant then name calling. When people resort to name calling to respond to statements it shows they do not have a valid response and are just trying to divert attention.

And to think he gets to vote. No wonder we get Bernie and Clavelle

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 3:39 AM, April 01, 2008

Anonymous has left a new comment on the post "Leahy: Hillary should quit race":

"As always, thanks for the kind words, Dr. B."

As always, you're ignorant trash with bupkis, schmuck.

Go cheney yourself.

Dismissed.

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 7:58 AM, April 01, 2008

Anonymous has left a new comment on the post "Leahy: Hillary should quit race":

"Me thinks JWcoop10 doth protest to much regarding white trash and other view points."

Nice try, nitwit. You're ignorant trash with bupkis. Clearly, you don't think at all.

"Nothing is more ignorant then name calling. When people resort to name calling to respond to statements it shows they do not have a valid response and are just trying to divert attention."

In other words, you want me to pretend you're a serious person with a legitimate point of view worthy of careful consideration and debate.

No sale, schmuck. You're not, you don't and I won't.

There is nothing valid about you or your bigoted-trash POV.

You don't have a point. You don't merit any other response.

"And to think he gets to vote. No wonder we get Bernie and Clavelle"

First of all, I hate to confuse ya with the facts, little lyin'-scum fella, but I don't live in Burlington, I never have lived in Burlington and Peter Clavelle has never won a state-wide election, but if you have any evidence to the contrary, as always, feel free to present it.

Secondly, yeah, I do get to vote. I voted for Pat Leahy in 1974 and I've been voting for him ever since. Evidently, I'm not alone in that regard since he keeps getting reelected while your ignorant, bigoted-trash, "take back Vermont" slop keeps getting rejected.

As for Bernie, I've been voting for him since 1990. I voted for Welch.

They won. Your clowns didn't.

Clearly, unlike you and your nameless-nitwit comrades, most Vermonters can think.

This is a blue state, little factually-challenged/fundamentally-dishonest fella. Deal with it.

If you want to live in an ignorant, white-supremacist slime pit, you're gonna have to head elsewhere in search of redder pastures.

Disappear.

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 8:57 AM, April 01, 2008

WOW...what a claim to fame! JW voted for the 3 biggest empty suits in Washington and not once but over and over and over. Not too bright.

There is nothing remotely legitimate about you or your point of view. You have demonstrated time and again you can not think outside the party line talking points you have been given. A simple count of the number of times you cut and paste the same hackneyed insults shows the limitation of your mental prowess.

You're just ignorant, bigoted trash with bupkis. Try having a critical independent thought.

Disappear.

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 10:35 AM, April 01, 2008

Anonymous has left a new comment on the post "Leahy: Hillary should quit race":

"WOW...what a claim to fame! JW voted for the 3 biggest empty suits in Washington and not once but over and over and over."

I hate to confuse ya with the facts, little fella, but so did most of Vermont, so my alleged "claim to fame" really belongs to the People of Vermont.

That's what we in the real world refer to as a fact.

Still, it's sweet of ya to say so.

Clearly, you do things differently in the Bizarro World. Unfortunately, Bizarro World rules don't apply here which leaves you pretty-well cheneyed, as you've showed time and time again, you don't fare well when the facts come into play.

Gee, that's a shame.

Outside of shrub, ya don't get elected if ya don't get the most votes.

Of course, shrub has yet to carry Vermont and based on the TM results, McCain ain't gonna do any better.

Clearly, Vermont ain't buyin' your dim-witted, delusional-dreck any more than I am.

"You have demonstrated time and again you can not think outside the party line talking points you have been given."

Nice try, schmuck. Like all ignorant trash with bupkis, you've demonstrated time and time again that you lack the capacity to think at all.

Disappear.

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 11:48 AM, April 01, 2008

Yawn.... more boring repeats...

Empty suit.

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 5:43 PM, April 01, 2008

Dr. Bupkis,

You've certainly got your factually-challenged/fundamentally-dishonest talking points down, little fella.

Too bad you've got no factual evidence.

Your ignorant trash with bupkis credentials remain impeccable.

In the words of the great B.B. King...'there ain't nobdy that loves ya but your mother'

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 5:47 PM, April 01, 2008

By the way, bupkis boy, while I'm pleased to hear you've heard of BB King, the rest of the line you've misapplied, misquoted and just generally cheneyed up six ways to Sunday is "She could be jivin', too."

In your case, that's a given, schmuck.

Dismissed.

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 7:35 PM, April 01, 2008

This comment has been removed by the author.

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 8:46 PM, April 01, 2008

JW you really know how to pick out the winners
I suppose you voted for Douglas and Dubie in 2002,04,06 too.
And if you want to keep your streak I'll bet you will be supporting Douglas and Dubie in 2008.

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 8:48 AM, April 02, 2008

Anonymous said...

"JW you really know how to pick out the winners
I suppose you voted for Douglas and Dubie in 2002,04,06 too.
And if you want to keep your streak I'll bet you will be supporting Douglas and Dubie in 2008."

Nice try, punk.

Again, little factually-challenged fella, just which part of the following is giving you trouble?

"I remind you, look at Vermont's Congressional Delegation and the composition of the State Legislature. This is a Blue State, little fella. The Douglas/Dubie Debacle is an aberration. Don't press your luck, schmuck."

Ya wanna compare batting averages, schmuck? Knock yourself out.

Dismissed.

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 9:27 AM, April 02, 2008

Batting average??????????????????

I got you pegged for the little girlie boy type who played jump rope while all the other boys played baseball :)

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 11:04 AM, April 02, 2008

Anonymous has left a new comment on the post "Leahy: Hillary should quit race":

"Batting average??????????????????

I got you pegged for the little girlie boy type who played jump rope while all the other boys played baseball :)"

This must be some of that reasoned discourse and independent thinking you're always telling me you're engaged in, little fraudulent-slime fella.

Go cheney yourself, chump.

You're ignorant, anonymous trash with bupkis.

Ya always were. Ya always will be.

That's your cement-headed ceiling, schmuck.

Then again, it's not like you can advocate your ignorant, ill-informed, white-supremacist slop or argue your pathetic case on the merits, little factually-challenged/fundamentally-dishonest fella.

There aren't any.

Dismissed.

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 4:04 PM, April 02, 2008

More kind words from the self-appointed poster boy/spokesmodel for the Democratic party in VT.

They must be so proud.

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 5:18 PM, April 02, 2008

Anonymous said...
"At 4:04 JW spews: Blah, blah,blah"

"Disappear Coopy"

Not a chance, chump. Go cheney yourself As long as ignorant, anonymous slime like you slither the Earth, I'll be here to meet ya.

Dismissed.

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 5:34 PM, April 02, 2008

This comment has been removed by the author.

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 9:47 PM, April 02, 2008

JW...........once a Girlie Boy always agirlie boy

must make Mommy happy

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 9:17 AM, April 03, 2008

yawn

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 5:04 PM, April 03, 2008

Just scroll past all the posts that say jw.

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 8:20 AM, April 04, 2008

Anonymous has left a new comment on the post "Leahy: Hillary should quit race":

"Just scroll past all the posts that say jw."

Given the fact that you're ignorant scum with bupkis, little factually-challenged fella, that's probably the wisest course of action.

Dismissed.

Post a comment.

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 8:30 AM, April 04, 2008

For the benefit of everyone reading this, all the people out there with at least half a brain shouldn't even bother responding to jwcoop. He is obviously mentally unbalanced, and judging by the amount of times he's said; nitwit, dimwitted, and little fella I would say he is seriously overcompensating for something.

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 5:08 AM, April 06, 2008

Anonymous said...

"For the benefit of everyone reading this, all the people out there with at least half a brain shouldn't even bother responding to jwcoop. He is obviously mentally unbalanced, and judging by the amount of times he's said; nitwit, dimwitted, and little fella I would say he is seriously overcompensating for something."

Nice try, iggy-slop.

In other words, you've made yet another bogus allegation you can't substantiate.

I'm shocked.

Like the rest of the nameless-nitwit community, you're ignorant, ill-informed, factually-challenged/fundamentally-dishonest ignorant trash with bupkis, schmuck.

Disappear.

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 1:11 PM, April 06, 2008

Thank you kindly for proving my point

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 4:25 AM, April 07, 2008

Anonymous has left a new comment on the post "Leahy: Hillary should quit race":

"Thank you kindly for proving my point"

Yeah, you're ignorant trash with bupkis and ya don't have one.

You're welcome, schmuck.

# Posted by:

JWCoop10 | 8:07 AM, April 07, 2008

Oh yeah?

# Posted by:

Anonymous | 12:47 PM, April 07, 2008