burlingtonfreepress.com

Sponsored by:

vt.Buzz ~ a political blog

Political notes from Free Press staff writers Terri Hallenbeck, Sam Hemingway and Nancy Remsen


5.31.2007

 

Veto power

So now we know we have at least two vetoes the Legislature will be dealing with July 11 - energy and campaign finance.

How's that impact any prospects for overriding? Does the veto of campaign finance muddy the waters for the energy efforts?

If legislative leaders wanted extra time to marshal their forces - which clearly they did by setting a veto session date for a time far, far away - does this mean their time will be splintered by having to fight two fights?

Does it mean some legislators can prove themselves to be good, obedient Democrats on one bill while doing what their home-base wants them to do on the other? Or does it anger and galvanize the Democrats all the more?

Can all this be done in one day or will legislators be here for the rest of July?

How much do these vetoes resonate with the public? We know there's been lots of interest on both sides of the energy bill, but does Average Joe give a dang about campaign finance (of course he should, but does he?)

Those are some of the political questions swimming around in the Montpelier mud puddles today.

- Terri Hallenbeck

Comments:
The campaign finance bill, if not vetoed, will again cost Vermont taxpayers millions of legal dollars, but hey, this is what liberal lawyers are all about! As for the "soak Energy" bill, it is just another attempt by leftists communists to emulate their hero Hugo Chavez.
 
The public does not care about campaign finance reform. I don't remember any people running on the issue last year. By the sounds, its good that the governor vetoed this bill.
 
If the public were told the truth about campaign finance they'd tear down the doors and demand it. All it would take is a little education. The money in politics is atrocious and money in politics is what prevents Douglas and Democrats from doing anything at all that is meaningful because they must do what is best for campaign donors. It's bad in Vermont, it's worse in Congress.
 
Hey! I've got an idea. Between now and July 11th whenever the veto session is, why doesn't a newspaper do some articles about campaign finance. They could interview people on both sides...maybe take some polls, get some public opinion. They could do a public service kinda. Nah, I need to know what Paris Hilton is up to. Nevermind.
 
Unfortunately, the US Supreme Court blunted the important piece of reform, which is limits on EXPENDITURES--the obvious identified problem in Vermont is wealthy people flooding the system with $$, but there is nothing in this bill that addresses that. Still, it's a good bill, more than doubling the previous low limits on CONTRIBUTIONS. The bill should not have been vetoed; Vermonters clearly want some controls on $$ in politics. There is NO evidence that contribution limits disadvantage non-incumbent challengers in any way.
 
We need a new Speaker of the Vermont House of Representatives!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
If this bill isn't vetoed then a Rich Tarrant type will be at a great advantage since candidates have no limits on how much they can donate to their own campaigns. I don't know about you but I don't want wealthy people being able to buy their way into the state house.
 
Impeach Shumlin
 
"...why doesn't a newspaper do some articles about campaign finance? They could interview people on both sides...maybe take some polls, get some public opinion. They could do a public service kinda. Nah, I need to know what Paris Hilton is up to. Nevermind."

LOL!!!! It also might require some actual legwork on a reporter's part, and we all know that just doesn't happen. It's easier to post oneself inside the State House and wait for the news to come to you. Forget Paris, now we have the TB guy to occupy our front pages.
 
A couple of good examples of why the Governor vetoed the Campaign Finance law --
1) In 2002, the National GOP donated about $600,000 to Douglas' gubernatorial campaign in the last couple of months when he overtook Racine.
2) In 2004, the National Governors Assn donated $300,000 in campaign TV ads to Douglas' Campaign.

Also, the whole Bennington State Office Building issue was resolved by moving the state workers into RENTED MOBILE OFFICE BUILDINGS rather finding downtown office space. The rental company is owned by the Fecteaus - MAJOR donors to Douglas' campaign.
 
Excuse me? Pleeeeese. Bill Sorrell's feigned surprise that the Governor would veto the campaign finance bill doesn't pass the straight face test -- but then again, neither did his $1.5 million dollar defense of the last campaign finance bill which was struck down by the US Supreme Court. While Sorrell was let off easy by the Vt media after his performance before the highest court in the land, the national media was not so kind. Sorrell's expensive little foray into tinkering with the democratic process turned Vermont into a laughing stock. Three cheers for Gov. Douglas!
 
Impeach Sorrell.
 
Sorrell's antics before the highest court in the nation earned him the #7 ranking on The Nation's Top Ten Worst Attorneys General list. Check it out at http://www.cei.org/dyn/view_expert.cfm?expert=246

Embarassing ......
 
Kudos to Governor Douglas for saving the state from facing another campaign finance law challenge, which would be sure to cost the taxpayers millions of dollars more -- at least the Legislature should have appropriated a funding source in advance if they insist on passing laws which will wind up on the court docket.
 
How can Bill Sorrell defend another campaign finance bill when he can't even produce the cost of losing the last one? I understand the bill hasn't even been paid yet! Can anyone ask his office for some kind of accountability?
 
"I don't know about you but I don't want wealthy people being able to buy their way into the state house."

Have you paid much attention to politics recently? FYI Rich Tarrant lost, so did Skip Vallee (who spent over $100,000 in a State Senate race), so did Jack McMullen. Seems to me that VT doesn't really need campaign finance reform. Vermonters seem to be doing a pretty good job making sure that people don't just buy their way into office.
 
Not to mention Rutland County Senator Bill Carris who spent his own money to buy a seat in the Vermont Senate
 
Sorrell's going to use the tobacco settlement to pay for his last campaign finance reform trip to the Supreme Court. And, there's plenty more where that came from. Impeach Sorrell.
 
Sorrell was blindsided by Anna Nichole
 
We all do realize what CEI is?
Shouldn't be a concern what they think about Sorrell.
 
Kudos to Governor Douglas for saving the state from facing another campaign finance law challenge....

So the governor preempts the court system by vetoing this bill and you're cheering this maneuver? Heck, why not just abolish the Supreme Court and let conservative bloggers (and half-assed governors) have the final say instead? Actually, the Supreme Court is stacked with fascist extremists anyway (led by Scalia, whose parenting skills resulted in a drunk driving conviction against his daughter).

Despite how bad Sorrell is as AG, I shudder to think of the day we must justify court costs *before* passing legislation. The right doesn't like campaign finance reform because they are comfortable with corporations determining their destiny. Reminds me of lab rats....
 
Would someone please ask the Attorney General how much his office (our taxpayer dollars) were spent in the preparations he did before his appearance in Washington DC before the Supreme Court. I remember his appearance on Channel 3 News -- he was so full of himself -- comparing his defense as a Triple Axle in the Olympics. What a joke. Do we have a Vermont Reporter who can find out the total amount -- or is this a cover-up?
 
Impeach Sorrell.
 
Is Scalia's "parenting skills" like Howard Dean's? Last I knew Howie's kid was arrested as the wheelman in a Burlington Country Club break in. (Long since covered up, of course).
 
Bill Sorrell is NO LONGER interested in being the Attorney General - ask his staff!

He wants to be Governor but really hates campaigning.
 
Governor Sorrell? Now THAT's a scary thought.
 
Sorell, Shumlin or Spaulding.
 
If you think Dean had a vindictive streak as Governor, woe be to us if Sorrell ever takes that job.
 
Sorrell will never be elected governor - he hates campaigning. The only reason Sorrell is in the AG's office is that Howard Dean had a vacancy to fill when he appointed then-AG Jeff Amestoy as Chief Justice of the VT Supreme Court. Sorrell was Dean's Secretary of Administration and Finance and he appointed him AG to replace Amestoy. Sorrell's mother, Esther Sorrell, was a long-time legislator from Burlington and a mentor to Dean in Ho-Ho's early years in Burlington and legislative politics. Sorrell's risen as far as he's going to.
 
I hope you are right or we are all in for it!
 
Vetoing the bill isn't necessarily going to save the state a lawsuit. Someone can just as easily challenge the concept of "revival" and the tatters of what was left by the U.S. Supreme Court. Face it, there will always be people who don't believe in any regulation of campaign, and as long as they're out there a possible lawsuit looms...
 
Its amazing how some people work so hard to get elected and some seem to just slide in.
 
Sorrell, Shumlin or Markowitz for
Governor? We need a new, fresh voice.
 
Neither Sorrell nor Shumlin are "fresh voices." Nor are they trustworthy. In a pinch I'd take Symington. I don't like her anti-business politics, but at least she's pretty honest.
 
I would not take any of those choices.
 
No way.
 
Post a Comment



<< Home

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

June 2006   July 2006   August 2006   September 2006   October 2006   November 2006   December 2006   January 2007   February 2007   March 2007   April 2007   May 2007   June 2007   July 2007   August 2007   September 2007   October 2007   November 2007   December 2007   January 2008   February 2008   March 2008   April 2008   May 2008   June 2008   July 2008   August 2008   September 2008   October 2008   November 2008   December 2008   January 2009   February 2009   March 2009   April 2009   May 2009   June 2009   July 2009   August 2009   September 2009   October 2009   November 2009   December 2009   January 2010   February 2010   March 2010   April 2010