The pundits will be plodding through the numbers out of New Hampshire's primary results for some time as they try to explain how they, and the pollsters got things so wrong on Tuesday night, at least on the Democratic side of the ledger.
I got it wrong, too, and so did you, I bet. As part of the Freeps walk up to Tuesday's vote, we identified three New Hampshire towns to watch as indicators as to how the Democratic vote was breaking. The towns we picked were Hanover, a traditionally Democratic town, Wolfesboro, a GOP dominant town, and Milford, which has an especially large percent of independent or "undeclared" voters.
I decided to see how things went in the three towns. Here's what the numbers show.
Hanover:
Obama 2,779
Clinton 1,248
McCain 740
Edwards 459
Romney 260
Paul 105*
Wolfeboro:
Romney 789
McCain 675
Obama 640
Clinton 517
Edwards 250
Huckabee 161
Milford
Clinton 1,092
Obama 1,052
McCain 978
Romney 867
Huckabee 512
Edwards 496
*Paul finished ahead of both Giuliani and Huckabee in Hanover. For a town-by-town look at the GOP results, click
here. For a town-by-town look at the Democratic results, click
here.
I found a couple of things interesting in these numbers. One, Obama did better than Clinton in a GOP town and, two, McCain was competitive with both Obama and Clinton in the "independent" town of Milford nad the overall division between the Rs and the Ds was nearly 50-50. As for Romney's win in Wolfesboro, that happens to be where he summers, so that may explain his win there.
Finally, while Hanover is a Dem town, it's also a college town, and such places are known to be Obama territory.
Thoughts?
-- Sam Hemingway