burlingtonfreepress.com

Sponsored by:

vt.Buzz ~ a political blog

Political notes from Free Press staff writers Terri Hallenbeck, Sam Hemingway and Nancy Remsen


11.06.2007

 

Terms of endearment

A majority of Vermonters want four-year terms for governor instead of the current two years, according to a poll the Snelling Center for Government commissioned and released today.

Results indicate that 58 percent of the 400 Vermonters polled would go for the four-year term for governor. That's up from 53 percent a year ago.

When it came to the Legislature, only 49 percent said they'd support a four-year term for senators and 43 percent for representatives.

Respondents were pretty clear (70 percent) that they'd like to make the choice separately for each office rather than in lump sum, if they were going to be making a choice. Changing the terms would require a constitutional amendment, a long process. If it's going to happen any time in the near future it has to pass the Legislature in 2008. It would have to pass the Senate by a two-thirds majority and the House by a majority, then pass a majority in both chambers again under a newly elected Legislature in 2009 before going to a public vote.

The poll asked respondents why they'd support the longer terms. The primary reason was that it would bring fewer election cycles and less politics. The second most common reason was it would allow more time to solve complex issues.

Those who opposed longer terms said it would reduce accountability.

What sort of person was most apt to support longer terms? Those in the 50-59 age group who describe themselves as independents and were either fairly poor (income of $25,000-$35,000) or wealthy (income over $100,000). It didn't matter what county they came from. They were more apt to be male and have a college degree.

Those less apt to support longer terms were Progressives and young people ages 18-29.

Perhaps what this means is we become more tired of elections as we get older.

- Terri Hallenbeck

Comments:
Why do we pay attention to these polls that only poll 400 people? That's not even two per town right?
 
A constitutional admendment would never happen.
 
If pollsters create a proper sample, 400 is sufficient to represent a very large population. I don't know whether the Snelling Center went to the trouble to do so, however. Perhaps Terri can find out for us.
 
This blog is getting ridiculous. Posts are good, but the comments appear to be one paid staffer from the VT Democratic Party, an unpaid Republican with way too much time on his hands, and Doug Hoffer - who apparently doesn't have any clients other than the VT Legislature and thus has time to hang out here all day (when he isn't hanging out on other blogs). BORING.
 
I agree, but why is the Dem a paid staffer and the Repub unpaid with too much free time?
 
Some people like me are not really involved in politics but really like a place to let our ideas be heard.
 
Likewise.
 
Post a Comment



<< Home

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

June 2006   July 2006   August 2006   September 2006   October 2006   November 2006   December 2006   January 2007   February 2007   March 2007   April 2007   May 2007   June 2007   July 2007   August 2007   September 2007   October 2007   November 2007   December 2007   January 2008   February 2008   March 2008   April 2008   May 2008   June 2008   July 2008   August 2008   September 2008   October 2008   November 2008   December 2008   January 2009   February 2009   March 2009   April 2009   May 2009   June 2009   July 2009   August 2009   September 2009   October 2009   November 2009   December 2009   January 2010   February 2010   March 2010   April 2010