burlingtonfreepress.com

Sponsored by:

vt.Buzz ~ a political blog

Political notes from Free Press staff writers Terri Hallenbeck, Sam Hemingway and Nancy Remsen


6.13.2007

 

Primary problem

Howard Dean, chairman of the Democratic National Committee, has gotten plenty of slaps on the back for his role in helping Democrats win back the House and Senate in the 2006 elections, but he's facing a new problem that could put him on the outs with some of those state party chairs he's been so chummy with up to now.



The Detroit News is reporting this morning that Michigan Dems want to move up their presidential caucus to Jan. 29 or even earlier -- whatever it takes to be in position to have maximum impact on who becomes the party's presidential nominee. Michigan Dems say it's time big states like theirs get to call the shots in the primary process, instead of allowing puny population states like New Hampshire and Iowa have all the glory. For the full story, click HERE.



The potential move by Michigan Dems comes one day after Florida Democrats basically thumbed their noses at Dean and said they planned to go ahead with a primary on Jan. 29. New Hampshire has already reset the date for its traditional first-in-the-nation primary to Jan. 22, and has vowed to make it even earlier in order to remain Number 1. Dean has threatened to strip Florida of its delegates to the national convention if Sunshine State Dems persist in trying to push the usual early birders to the sidelines.

Dean saw his own presidential fortunes flop in Iowa and New Hampshire in 2004, but as the former governor of our small state, he is understandably an admirer of retail politics. Plus, he knows that when a small state is at the head of the primary schedule, White House wannabes are forced to go face-to-face with the voters, instead of simply paying for face time on TV to get their message across.

But it's also understandable why the big states want the prestige, power and, uh, the money that flows from being in a pole position in the race for the party's presidential nomination. Michigan Dems say they'll do whatever it takes to supplant New Hampshire primary's traditional first-in-the-nation status -- even if it means having their caucus in late December. Imagine that, deciding on the party's nominee 11 months before the general election!

Exactly how Dean navigates his way through this internecine minefield will be interesting to watch. He can stick to his guns and stick it to the delegates of Florida and Michigan if their state parties ignore his warnings, but does he really want alienate Dems in such important electoral states?

"This thing could be a total mess unless we find a way out of this," Senator Bill Nelson, D-Fla., told the Associated Press this week.

Aaaaargh!

-- Sam Hemingway

Comments:
This is a HUGE issue for our democracy.

A candidate can do well in a small state without a lot of money.

But you need a lot of dough to run a primary in a state the size of California or even Michigan.

So, a little known candidate can win in NH, Iowa or South Carolina without selling his/her soul to the moneyed interests -- and use that bump to help them win in the larger states.

The best candidate on earth can't compete if the larger states are first in the primary process – unless he (or she) has a pile of money.

Dean is right on this one.
 
US House Democratic leader Rahm Emanuel has said that he believes the Democratic presidential nominee will be selected by Valentine's Day next year because so many primaries and caucuses will be held in January and early February.

If Emanuel is right, Vermont's March 5 primary will be irrelevant. If the Democratic nominee is indeed known before March 5, how about a write-in campaign for Howard Dean for President in the Vermont primary, to protest the front-loading of the nomination campaign that makes Vermonters' votes meaningless?
 
You know I think those states have a point. As much as I admire the retail politics of New Hampshire(some of those Granite Staters are on a first name basis with candidates as far back as Richard Nixon). Is New Hampshire truly representative of the United States? On the issue of ethnic diversity alone the nod has to go to a larger state like California
 
California gets it's say on super Tuesday.

Their influence is still very strong.

Why bump out poorly funded candidates by front loading with big states?
 
The big states can wait.
 
Deb Markowitz for Governor.
 
Jeb Spaulding is a better choice.
 
Agreed. He now knows how the money thing works.
 
So does Deb!
 
Post a Comment



<< Home

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

June 2006   July 2006   August 2006   September 2006   October 2006   November 2006   December 2006   January 2007   February 2007   March 2007   April 2007   May 2007   June 2007   July 2007   August 2007   September 2007   October 2007   November 2007   December 2007   January 2008   February 2008   March 2008   April 2008   May 2008   June 2008   July 2008   August 2008   September 2008   October 2008   November 2008   December 2008   January 2009   February 2009   March 2009   April 2009   May 2009   June 2009   July 2009   August 2009   September 2009   October 2009   November 2009   December 2009   January 2010   February 2010   March 2010   April 2010