burlingtonfreepress.com

Sponsored by:

vt.Buzz ~ a political blog

Political notes from Free Press staff writers Terri Hallenbeck, Sam Hemingway and Nancy Remsen


6.20.2007

 

Got your passport?

Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-VT, has strong words today for federal officials who want to push ahead with passport requirements for border crossings. I hope the folks in Derby Line have already applied for their passports given the backlog that exists now. They are going to need them just to cross the street to see their neighbors in Stanstead, Quebec.

Here's Leahy's comments. WHTI stands for Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative and DHS is the Department of Homeland Security.

“WHTI in the hands of DHS is like a skydiver who jumps first and tries to pack his parachute on the way down. Today’s huge passport backlogs, prompted by the launch of DHS’s requirement for air travel passports, are just a taste of the chaos that’s likely next summer when they want to start enforcing passport checks at our land and sea borders, which account for ten times the volume for air travel.

“Month after month and hearing after hearing, DHS and State have high-handedly rushed to impose this new border-crossing plan on the American people before they are ready with the necessary technology, infrastructure and training, and at every step their rosy assurances have been wrong. Their record on this is clear, and it has been abysmal. These hollow demands to ‘just trust us’ don’t cut it anymore from the agency that defined competence down after Katrina.

“There is another train wreck on the horizon if they continue pushing forward with full implementation of WHTI before the necessary policies and procedures are in place to handle the surge in applications, to resolve potential complications in producing a new and untested passport card, and to prepare for the lengthy border delays that are in the offing.

“Frustrated Americans by the thousands have been calling congressional offices for emergency help during the current passport backlog mess, and we have been doing what we can – passport by passport. The State Department and DHS vastly underestimated the passport demand for WHTI’s air component – which is a small percentage of all cross-border traffic – and I remain concerned that their continued public insistence of full implementation of the land and sea travel provisions in January 2008 is unrealistic and unachievable on that timetable. Let us not set the American people up yet again for failure and frustration.

“Since DHS keeps saying that the WHTI is a ‘congressionally mandated’ program, they should stop opposing the bicameral and bipartisan legislation now moving through Congress to shift the new passport requirement to June 2009. They have been warned repeatedly, yet even the fresh embarrassment of this passport debacle hasn’t knocked sense into them. Unfortunately, this impracticable timetable announcement today shows that DHS and State are not committed to making fundamental reforms to the program before they unleash it on the public. By maintaining the fiction that they will be ready to implement the largest phase of this program next January, they are recklessly risking the travel plans of millions of Americans and the economies of scores of states and communities.”

--Nancy Remsen

Comments:
There are two issues here that need to be separated:

1. Requiring a passport to enter the US by land from Canada or Mexico.

2. The incompetence of the State Department meeting the demand for passports.

The bureaucracy should have been able to anticipate that the volume of business in the Passport Agency would go up substantially as a result of the new requirements. They didn't plan for the new business, citizens complain to Congress, and Congress talks about delaying the passport requirement.

Instead, Congress should give the Passport Agency enough money to hire more people, pay overtime, do whatever it takes to issue as many passports as they can in as short a time as they can, consistent with the usual security checks that are part of the passport issuance process.

There is nothing wrong with the basic requirement to present a passport to enter the US via land. A passport is an internationally recognized document issued according to internationally recognized standards. That's a lot more than can be said for state and provincial drivers' licenses and other forms of ID.
 
This is so much fun - that is why Douglas is waiting for Leahy to retire to he can run for the US Senate - he will probably win.
 
That looks like his strategy and it
has always worked in the past.
 
You go, Jimbo!
 
Post a Comment



<< Home

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

June 2006   July 2006   August 2006   September 2006   October 2006   November 2006   December 2006   January 2007   February 2007   March 2007   April 2007   May 2007   June 2007   July 2007   August 2007   September 2007   October 2007   November 2007   December 2007   January 2008   February 2008   March 2008   April 2008   May 2008   June 2008   July 2008   August 2008   September 2008   October 2008   November 2008   December 2008   January 2009   February 2009   March 2009   April 2009   May 2009   June 2009   July 2009   August 2009   September 2009   October 2009   November 2009   December 2009   January 2010   February 2010   March 2010   April 2010